Comparative judicial systems
The attainment of the welfare state, the increased complexity of socioeconomic relationships, the strong presence of the state in the economy, internationalization, and cross-border proceedings have contributed to the expansion of judicial activity in liberal-democratic regimes. Judicial systems are called upon to carry out increasingly complex activities with profound effects on social and economic reality, as well as quantitatively significant.
Furthermore, in recent decades some long-term pressures have changed the framework in which judicial systems operate, such as rationalization of expenditure, harmonization of European systems (and beyond), widespread application of new public management, massive adoption of technologies, increasing demand for justice and the quality of the offer. These thrusts have outlined profound changes and determined the promotion of numerous projects for the reform of justice: organization and procedures, but also of its institutional setting.
Therefore, this study area aims to conduct comparative research on the judicial system’s structural and functional characteristics, considering its relationship with other national and supranational political institutions and the socioeconomic environment. The resulting understanding of the processes of change in judicial systems assumes a scientific value and provides guidance tools for policymakers engaged in the justice innovation process.
